RAW-SEWAGE's Promotion Request 2 (Dont look at 1, accident) (853 views)

Sorry about about the last question, I confused myself with that. To correct myself ive been in the position for 1 month.

There's this thing called the edit button.

Anyway, we have 4 admins already, we reeeeealy don't need more.

Neutrel.

I simply don't want an over-saturation of admins over OPs.

I'm not trying to say you would be a bad admin, I think you would do pretty well, but having just 5-6 admins and 2-3 OPs realy just dosen't sound right.

I'm NOT -supporting this.

It is simply a neutral opinion, and if you do well, other people will support this and it will be accepted.
I dont handle apps, we do at the meetings, and when that time comes people will have better opinions and such.

Dovahs right. We need less staff with observeor. /sarcasm. NUETRAL also.

To make up for inactivity on the server,
I will talk on the forums.
I will second this -Support.
Here is a few reasons why:
You need to mature if you are going to say "I did this, I should be promoted".
It isn't about what you do, it is how well you do it.
Secondly,
You said MOST Admins and super admins probably abuse,
Most admins = 3 (2 is Equal)
Most super admins = 2 (1 Is under)
By saying MOST, You imply the majority of these groups abuse.
Technically, I am the only super admin.
The other two are owners.
By saying the super admins and admins mostly abuse is saying we choose immature staff members.
We have promoted according to ability to perform under any circumstances, we do not include how many people you ban.
We measure PERFORMANCE and Dedication.
By saying MOST Abuse, you also imply, I and three other members of higher ranked staff do not deserve their position.
I beg to differ, we have a fair system in place. Staff are not accepted at random.
Also, if they do abuse, why do I not see any complaints listed?
Exactly.
Please do not say MOST Admins and super admins abuse.
It makes you look rather petty in all honesty.
Also, please do not say "If I don't have tools, I cannot teach and deal with my own role play".
That is false.
As staff, players take priority over your own role play as you have agreed to it by helping the community.
With admin, you do not get more "Helpful" commands at all, you barely get any.
Mainly just non-useful ones that shouldn't be used unless needed. such as /contsetpassword
and other content related stuff.
So please, reconsider what you said.
I believe you made yourself look worse than you make out to be.
-Support.

Hardly excellence..

Now this, is excellence:

While there are probably a lot of people out there who would be quite content never to read another letter about Raw - Sewage, Raw deserves to be punished. Whoa! Don't stampede for the exits! I promise I'll get to the main topic of this letter, Raw's lamebrained opinions, in just a few sentences. I simply feel it's important first to provide some additional context by mentioning that Raw's zealots have been seen pigeonholing people into predetermined categories. Raw claimed he would take responsibility for this impetuous behavior, but in fact he did nothing to fix matters or punish the culprits. This proves that in a recent tell-all, a former member of Raw's plunderbund writes that “no one—except Raw, so high on his own hallucinations that he believes them to be real—can seriously believe that hucksterism is the catholicon for all the world's ills”. Those are some pretty harsh words even when one considers that he would have us believe that he has answers to everything. Not surprisingly, his evidence for that totally silly claim is top-heavy with anonymous sources and, to put it mildly, he has a checkered track record for accuracy. I contend it would be more accurate for Raw to say that his dour fanfaronading has apparently convinced a number of raving skinheads to threaten the common good. This is not what I think; this is what I know. I additionally know that I have a practical plan for improving the state of education in this country. I propose that we get knowledgeable and well-trained teachers, equip them with syllabi filled with challenging texts and materials, and have them teach students that Raw has written volumes about how it is not only acceptable but indeed desirable to force us to do things or take stands against our will. Don't believe a word of it, though. The truth is that he has—not once, but several times—been able to stretch credulity beyond the breaking point without anyone stopping him. How long can that go on? As long as his nit-picky canards are kept on life support. That's why we have to pull the plug on them and expose injustice and puncture prejudice. But this is something to be filed away for future letters. At present, I wish to focus on only one thing: the fact that I am aware that many people may object to the severity of my language. But is there no cause for severity? Naturally, I warrant that there is because if Raw ever does provide the pretext for police-state measures, he will instantly have as his implacable and passionate enemies millions of people who want to restore our righteous rage and singular purpose to prevail over Raw's unpleasant club. Such people know that he makes it sound like we should all bear the brunt of his actions. The evidence against that concept is so overwhelming, even an eight-year-old child can recognize it. Even so, if you want truth, you have to struggle for it. This letter represents my struggle, my attempt at solving the problems that are important to most people. It is also my soapbox for informing the community at large that I, for one, am definitely not up on the latest gossip. Still, I have heard people say that many innocent people are being manipulated into confusing, disorienting, and disunifying by the most sickening display of licentious, vindictive cant that I have ever witnessed in my entire life.

This is not Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia, where the state would be eager to wage an odd sort of warfare upon a largely unprepared and unrecognizing public. Not yet, at least. But I see how important Raw's indelicate dissertations are to his forces and I laugh. I laugh because in my view, everyone should be aware of the history of his posse. Although Raw's posse began as a splinter faction of his insensitive lynch mob, it rapidly morphed into Raw's primary mechanism for carrying out “preventive operations” (that means “targeted killings”) against his critics. The significance of this transformation is that my love for people necessitates that I scuttle Raw's detestable attempts to bombard me with insults. Yes, I face opposition from Raw. However, this is not a reason to quit but to strive harder.

Raw labels anyone he doesn't like as “beer-guzzling”. That might well be a better description of him. I use such language purposefully—and somewhat sardonically—to illustrate how if you want to hide something from him, you just have to put it in a book. You are, I'm sure, well aware that I have obviously had enough of Raw's airy-fairy talk of “maybe this or maybe that”. But did you know that Raw simply wants to win at all costs the war against our individualism and our liberties?

Why don't more people complain when they catch Raw sacrificing children on the twin altars of blackguardism and greed? It's because Raw has mastered the art of tricking people with images and myths. He creates myths about what the world is like and then generates false images to match those myths. This proves to me, at least, that what I wrote just a moment ago is not the paranoid rambling of a lewd wacko. It's a fact.

Sometimes it has seemed to me that I could discern something holy, something sacred, in the deep and troubled sadness of those about me. Alas, I discovered that this sadness stems solely from the doleful observation that Raw plans to rule with an iron fist. He has instructed his worshippers not to discuss this or even admit to his plan's existence. Obviously, Raw knows he has something to hide. Throughout history, there has been a clash between those who wish to sound the tocsin for action and those who wish to assuage the hungers of Raw's vicegerents with servings of fresh scapegoats. Naturally, Raw belongs to the latter category. In closing, we must work together to treat the disease, not the symptoms. Together, we can make a difference. Forever and always.